🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an observance that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, expanding to include events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The History of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The month has developed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and increasingly on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the celebration is observed is a reflection of the current political situation. How it evolves is a instructive case in how co-option leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in British history. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels empowered to say that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the state. A effort to remove the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by depicting the United States “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance represents how little it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Figuring out how to adapt, revise and extend actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not avoid political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the history when it fails to address the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but faced with the risks that face all if anti-racism is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is required – Contemporary Black History Month.